13-Year-Old Dies in Skiing Accident in Massachusetts

Skiing is a very popular winter sport, especially in New England. While skiing can be a lot of fun, accidents can occur. Many of the accidents are what one might consider normal skiing accidents such as falling when getting off a chairlift and breaking a bone or staining a muscle.

sunpeaks-1-1307370-m.jpgEveryone who goes skiing should know there are risks associated with the sport. However, some skiing accidents, while they don't occur frequently, are much more serious and can result in death of a skier.

According to recent news article from the Lowell Sun, a 13-year-old boy was killed at ski resort in Massachusetts. Authorities say young victim had died when he hit a tree in what appears to be this particular ski resort's first fatal accident in its operational history.

Continue reading "13-Year-Old Dies in Skiing Accident in Massachusetts " »

New England Man Seriously Injured in Snowmobile Accident

Every winter in Massachusetts and throughout New England, people head outdoors and look for fun family activities to do in the cold snowy weather. One of the more popular winter activities is riding a snowmobile.

snow-mobile-at-sefsen-sweden-1-596152-m.jpgWhile some are lucky enough to own a snowmobile, many choose instead to rent one for the day. Snowmobiling can be a lot of fun and excitement, but it can also be very dangerous. According to a recent news article from the Union Leader, a New Hampshire man was seriously injured in a snowmobile accident, and is said to be in a life-threatening condition at a local hospital.

Witnesses say the crash occurred early Tuesday morning on a local pond. The 53-year-old victim was a passenger on a snowmobile being operated by someone else around 3 a.m. Driver crashed into a rock, which was partially exposed from icy surface of the pond. The snowmobile flipped over when it hit the rock throwing female operator and victim off the machine. Victim then crashed into more exposed rocks after being thrown from snowmobile. It should be noted neither victim nor driver were wearing a helmet at the time of this serious accident.

Continue reading "New England Man Seriously Injured in Snowmobile Accident " »

Hyundai Motor Co. v. Duncan: Expert Testimony in Personal Injury Cases

In Hyundai Motor Co. v. Duncan, plaintiff suffered a serious closed-head injury when he lost control of his car. After losing control of the car, he left the road, hit two snow banks, crashed into a large hay bale and ultimately hit a tree on the driver's side of the car. His vehicle was equipped with a side airbag, but it did not deploy during this accident.

airbag-control-743960-m.jpgFollowing his injury, conservators of victim filed civil lawsuit in victim's name. Defendant was car manufacturer who produced the car. Claims were initially made for negligence, failure of the implied warranty of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, breach of express warranty, and failure to warn. Boston personal injury attorneys may also have the ability to seek triple damages in a defective products claim pursuant to Chapter 93A of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act.

The case proceeded to trial, and plaintiff pursued only the claims for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and unreasonable dangerous design. Plaintiff argued if the airbag sensor had been put in a different place, it would have deployed and prevented claimant from being seriously injured in the crash.

Continue reading "Hyundai Motor Co. v. Duncan: Expert Testimony in Personal Injury Cases " »

Martin v. Dematic: Wrongful Death and Personal Injury

Martin v. Dematic, a wrongful death case from Supreme Court of Washington, involved plaintiff who was killed by a machine at a paper plant. Decedent's wife filed a wrongful death and survival action in civil court naming several defendants. One defendant was the company that installed the tissue-making machine that killed decedent.

piles-of-paper-3-834457-m.jpgTwo weeks later, defendant filed a response in which it demanded indemnification from another company. This company had actually installed the tissue-making machine and, under the stock tender agreement, was still liable for any actions resulting from negligence occurring prior to 1996. This machine had been installed in 1980, so defendant claimed this company was actually responsible for any damages to plaintiff.

Continue reading "Martin v. Dematic: Wrongful Death and Personal Injury " »

Stuhlmacher v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.: Defective Products Cases

In Stuhlmacher v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., plaintiff was injured in November of 2008 while building a cabin for his parents. The cabin was in Sullivan, Indiana. A few days before his accident, plaintiff purchased a four-legged stepladder from a big box hardware retailer, so he could work on the roof.

stair-folding-1185444-m.jpgDuring his first time using the ladder, it fell from the side of the house. He grabbed onto the rafters and then fell to the ground on the right front rail of the ladder. His groin made contact with the ladder when he fell. He suffered a shoulder injury, but his most serious personal injury was to his penis. His doctor diagnosed plaintiff with Peyronie's disease.

Peyronie's disease is painful condition that causes one's penis to become bent, which among other things prevented plaintiff from having sexual intercourse with his wife.
As our Boston personal injury attorneys can explain, when a victim of a personal injury is no longer able to have a normal intimate relationship with his or her spouse, the law provides a remedy known as loss of consortium damages, which can be awarded to the victim's spouse.

Continue reading "Stuhlmacher v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.: Defective Products Cases " »

Branham v. Rock: Standard of Care in Medical Malpractice Cases

Branham v. Rock, a personal injury appeal from the Supreme Court of Kentucky, involved plaintiff who was injured while riding as a passenger in her husband's truck. She was not wearing a seat belt when the truck drove off the road and hit a tree. The passenger side airbag deployed but did not prevent her from hitting the front windshield. He was briefly unconscious following the car crash.

helicopter-1335914-m.jpgEmergency workers arrived at the scene and took her to a local hospital where doctors ordered a head and neck CT scan. The scan was done "out of an abundance of caution" to rule out internal bleeding. She was then transported by air to another trauma center. There doctors ordered a chest x-ray, which revealed blunting to the left costophrenic angle, which could be related to "effusion or scarring" and a "3.5 cm mass-like density" in the left lower lobe. This caused concern among doctors, but she was discharged with instructions to follow-up with her primary care physician.

About 36 hours later, she died from what the autopsy revealed to be a ruptured aorta caused by blunt-force trauma to the chest. A year following her death, plaintiff filed a wrongful death action, claiming medical malpractice against the hospitals and treating physicians. The trial judge dismissed claims against hospitals on grounds of sovereign immunity, and the jury found for the defendants. Plaintiff appealed trial court's finding of sovereign immunity and jury's verdict claiming it was inconsistent with evidence presented at trial.

Continue reading "Branham v. Rock: Standard of Care in Medical Malpractice Cases " »

Whaley v. Sharp: Personal Injury Actions and Municipal Defendants

Whaley v. Sharp, a case from the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas, involved a plaintiff who went to defendant's emergency room for treatment. The day after being admitted, plaintiff was to be transferred to Wichita for additional treatment. She died in transit.

washington-dc-4-181266-m.jpgPlaintiff's adult daughter was appointed personal representative of plaintiff's estate and a submitted a claim to defendant's attorney. Plaintiff claimed hospital was responsible for the negligent conduct of its employees and also failed to properly hire, credential, and supervise its employees. Damages were in the amount of $1.25 million according to court records.

Continue reading "Whaley v. Sharp: Personal Injury Actions and Municipal Defendants " »

Gilbert v. Wessels: National Standard of Care

Gilbert v. Wessels, a case from the Supreme Court of Tennessee, involved plaintiff who underwent laser eye surgery performed by defendant ophthalmologist. After suffering a serious personal injury as a result of this surgery, plaintiff filed a medical malpractice action against defendant.

laser-1-327335-m.jpgTrial court set the case for trial in July of 2012, and then later continued trial date until October of 2012. Less than a month before trial, defendant filed a motion to waive the state's contiguous state requirement for expert witnesses, requesting that an ophthalmologist from Florida be allowed to testify on his behalf at trial.

His reason for this was only three doctors in the county, he claimed, were experts in this new type of laser eye surgery, and there was not a doctor in his state or a neighboring state who could testify about the appropriate standard of care when performing this eye surgery.

Continue reading "Gilbert v. Wessels: National Standard of Care " »

Grimes v. Saban: Assault and Battery Claims

Grimes v. Saban is a personal injury case from the Supreme Court of Alabama. Plaintiff and defendant, along with others, were in the kitchen at defendant's apartment after spending the night a local bar. According to court records, both parties were drinking alcohol at the time of the incident.

young-generation-2-1179314-m.jpgPlaintiff allegedly offended defendant when telling her to shut up. Defendant locked herself in her bedroom. While there she allegedly posted disparaging remarks about plaintiff on Facebook. Plaintiff confronted her about this and Defendant held up her phone saying she already deleted the post. The two women then got into a physical altercation.

During the fight, the cellphone was thrown against a wall and more fighting occurred. Eventually the parties were separated and her friends drove plaintiff to the emergency room. She later filed a civil action for assault and battery in connection with her injuries.

Continue reading "Grimes v. Saban: Assault and Battery Claims " »

Hammond v. Saini: Discovery in Medical Malpractice Cases

In Hammond v. Saini, a case from the Supreme Court of North Carolina, plaintiff went to defendant's hospital in 2010, to remove a possible basal cell carcinoma on her face. During surgery, drapes were placed on plaintiff's face, and an anesthesiologist along with nurse anesthetists administered supplemental oxygen to plaintiff though a mask.

Continue reading "Hammond v. Saini: Discovery in Medical Malpractice Cases " »

Daycare Worker Arrested for Kissing Eight-Year-Old Child

When we drop our children off at daycare before heading to work, we trust employees will take good of them. We also trust daycare owners have properly screened and trained their employees, so no harm will come to our children.

hand-cuffs-12754-m.jpgAccording to a recent news article from WTNH, a New England area daycare worker is facing criminal charges after allegedly kissing an eight-year-old girl on the lips. Authorities are reporting a 77-year-old employee kissed the girl during an after-school program. It is has been alleged he kissed the young victim on at least five separate occasions.

During a police interview, daycare employee said it was the young child who accidentally kissed him while she was running and jumping into his arms. He also stated he viewed it as an accident, which occurred during an embrace between friends and happened on several other occasions earlier that month in the same manner.

Continue reading "Daycare Worker Arrested for Kissing Eight-Year-Old Child " »

Grove v. Peacehealth St. Joseph Hospital: Proving Medical Malpractice Claims

In Grove v. Peacehealth St. Joseph Hospital, an appeal from the Washington Supreme Court, plaintiff underwent a six-hour heart surgery procedure by a doctor at defendant's hospital. This surgery occurred on December 21, 2006. He remained plaintiff's primary doctor until December 25, 2006, when he left for the holidays. At this point, a second doctor took over plaintiff's care and remained as such until plaintiff was released from the hospital.

heart-1063962-m.jpgWhile plaintiff's heart surgery was successful, his recovery did not go so well. He suffered various complications, including pneumonia and a blood infection. Doctors had to intubate plaintiff on December 23 through December 26 and had to bring in an infectious disease specialist to treat plaintiff.

By December 29, 2006, his left calf was swollen, red, and painful and he had extremely weak joints, especially in his left leg. His doctors believed he had an infection known as cellulitis, which is normally treated with antibiotics, even though plaintiff was already on antibiotics due to his earlier blood infection.

Continue reading "Grove v. Peacehealth St. Joseph Hospital: Proving Medical Malpractice Claims " »

Braintree Family Sues Grocery Chain After Son's Death

According to a recent report from the Braintree Patch, a local family is suing a national grocery store owner and a cattle ranch in Missouri after their son died after ingesting a powerful strain of E. coli bacteria. The family is alleging their son became sick from eating tainted ground beef sold at the Braintree store.

grillin-burgers-858671-m.jpgThis grass-fed beef was produced from cattle raised at the Missouri ranch and sold at the local market. After this incident, the retailer issued a recall of all ground beef due to possible E. coli contamination.

Storeowners have issued a statement expressing their condolences to the family for the tragic loss of their son, but they deny any liability for the incident, claiming investigations did not show any link to their business. The ranch owners also issued statements saying their testing has conclusively established the contaminated meat did not come from their ranch.

Continue reading "Braintree Family Sues Grocery Chain After Son's Death " »

Maguire v. City of Providence: Liability for Failing to Maintain a Sidewalk

Maguire v. City of Providence, a case from the Rhode Island Supreme Court, involved plaintiff who was disabled and walking with a crutch when the crutch got stuck in a hole in the sidewalk pavement. This caused her to lose her balance and fall onto the sidewalk. She suffered various personal injuries as a result of this fall.

broken-sidewalk-2-1090214-m.jpgThe sidewalk where she fell was in front of land owned by a developer and leased by a retail store and a restaurant. Plaintiff filed a civil negligence action against retail store, restaurant, and the city of Providence treasurer. The complaint included state negligence claims and federal disability claims.

Continue reading "Maguire v. City of Providence: Liability for Failing to Maintain a Sidewalk " »

Cope v. Utah Valley State College: Respondeat Superior in Personal Injury Cases

Cope v. Utah Valley State College, a case from the Supreme Court of Utah, involved plaintiff who was a member of a dance team at a state-owned university. She was enrolled in college courses that provided academic credit for participation on the dance team.

tango-dancers-1392779-m.jpgDuring a practice session, she was performing a routine where her dance partner lifted her on his shoulders and then she would do a backflip. During the learning phase of new routines, it is common for spotters to be present to prevent the performer from being injured.

On this particular occasion, there were not spotters present, and plaintiff and her dance partner performed the move two times. Both times, the pair was unable perform the lift properly. Her dance partner told the course instructor that he was unable to perform this lift properly, and she instructed them to try a third time. She told partner to lift with more force and plaintiff to push off into the flip with more force as well. She told them if they didn't get it right, it would be cut from the routine.

Continue reading "Cope v. Utah Valley State College: Respondeat Superior in Personal Injury Cases " »